Today's hottest deals

Asus Vivo AIO 22 V222GA_V222GA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus Vivo AIO 22 V222GA_V222GA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK V222GA
Memory9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191030
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '22 at 13:13
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4005
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Memory 48.1
1-Core 51.2
2-Core 118
41% 72.4 Pts
4-Core 116
8-Core 116
15% 116 Pts
64-Core 117
7% 117 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Asus(1043 1E80) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.43% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 4.5
2% 2.93 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.2
1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.43%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
EYOTA-240GB 240GB
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0424A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 253 5.3 8.1 67 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 422
Write 332
Mixed 19.6
SusWrite 74.7
46% 212 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 7.6
4K Mixed 0.7
20% 6.03 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CRC M471A5244CB0-CRC 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.2% Very poor
MC Read 6.2
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 6.6
20% 6.9 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 3.9
11% 3.93 GB/s
Latency 168
24% 168 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Vivo AIO 22 V222GA_V222GA Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Vivo AIO 22 V222GA_V222GA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback