Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	45.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G3900-$25 6,695 User benchmarks, average bench 49% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	27.1% Poor	Memory 45.9 1-Core 25.3 2-Core 50.9 27% 40.7 Pts	4-Core 50.4 8-Core 50.6 7% 50.5 Pts	64-Core 50.2 3% 50.2 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% XFX(1682 C570) CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04 Performing below potential (56^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.4% Average	Lighting 56.9 Reflection 54.2 Parallax 78.5 46% 63.2 fps	MRender 59.2 Gravity 60.9 Splatting 43.8 44% 54.6 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 49%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Alseye 128GB 128GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2109XKR SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 260 303 179 104 52 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	57.8% Above average	Read 345 Write 397 Mixed 328 SusWrite 182 70% 313 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 49.4 4K Mixed 26.3 90% 31.9 MB/s	DQ Read 67 DQ Write 148 DQ Mixed 113 84% 109 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	33.2% Below average	MC Read 11 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 11.2 35% 12.2 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 8.8 25% 8.67 GB/s	Latency 177 23% 177 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

SSD
128GB 128GBAlseyeBench 71%, 13 samples	2x
SSDNow UV400 120GBKingston $35Bench 67%, 80,916 samples	2x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	2x

RAM
CL15-15-15 D4-2133 4x8GBUnknownBench 77%, 119 samples	3x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	2x
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	2x

Value: 105% - Outstanding

Total price: $126

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16