HPE ProLiant ML30 Gen10

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	86.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HPE ProLiant ML30 Gen10 (all builds)
Motherboard	HPE ProLiant ML30 Gen10
Memory	4.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201027
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	May 17 '22 at 14:08
Run Duration	204 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	35%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E-2224 284 User benchmarks, average bench 86% Proc 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	72.7% Very good	Memory 77.6 1-Core 130 2-Core 258 84% 155 Pts	4-Core 384 8-Core 434 54% 409 Pts	64-Core 386 24% 386 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$75 60,851 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 310GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 86 80 92 104 91 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	86.1% Excellent	Read 495 Write 361 Mixed 316 SusWrite 105 71% 319 MB/s	4K Read 31.1 4K Write 84.5 4K Mixed 40.3 144% 52 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 318 DQ Mixed 258 218% 319 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 130%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$75 60,851 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 154GB free Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 82 76 88 108 93 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	98.1% Outstanding	Read 507 Write 360 Mixed 438 SusWrite 106 79% 353 MB/s	4K Read 41.2 4K Write 88.2 4K Mixed 53.4 178% 60.9 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 338 DQ Mixed 356 268% 357 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 98.1% Great: 130%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 473GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 60 54 61 69 64 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	Read 141 Write 126 Mixed 75.5 SusWrite 65.5 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 238% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32 107,978 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 163GB free Firmware: JC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 51 47 52 59 55 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	42.7% Average	Read 93.4 Write 100 Mixed 63.4 SusWrite 55 58% 77.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HPE 879527-091 1x16GB 86 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	47.7% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 17.3 MC Mixed 14.8 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 14.8 42% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 85.2 47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ProLiant ML30 Gen10 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: HPE ProLiant ML30 Gen10

CPU
Xeon E-2124IntelBench 84%, 385 samples	5x
Xeon E-2224IntelBench 86%, 284 samples	2x
Xeon E-2134IntelBench 84%, 98 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	1x
Quadro 600NvidiaBench 3%, 15,964 samples	1x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	1x

SSD
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	1x
SHGP31-500GM 500GBBench 301%, 939 samples	1x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $75Bench 224%, 92,081 samples	1x

RAM
879527-091 1x16GBHPEBench 50%, 86 samples	3x
NOT AVAILABLE 2x16GBUNKNOWNBench 50%, 63 samples	1x
879526-091 1x8GBHPEBench 45%, 31 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $35

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16