PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 70.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 239% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell PowerEdge T620 |
Motherboard | Dell PowerEdge T620 (all builds) |
Memory | 247.7 GB free of 256 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20191206 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | May 18 '22 at 23:08 |
Run Duration | 313 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
CPU1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
|
61.4%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro M6000
HP(103C 1129) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1152 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
70.9%
Very good
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
237GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1423 1431 1416 1427 1420 1424 MB/s
|
239%
Outstanding
|
|||
Pliant LB806M 800GB
714GB free
Firmware: D339
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 224 221 218 203 218 MB/s
|
24.2%
Poor
|
|||
Dell PERC H310 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 2.12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 307 313 310 314 304 MB/s
|
||||
Dell PERC H310 12TB
11TB free
Firmware: 2.12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 223 221 222 225 223 MB/s
|
135%
Outstanding
|
|||
Hitachi HUH721212AL 12TB
11TB free
Firmware: T620
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 229 231 233 229 227 MB/s
|
112%
Outstanding
|
|||
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 64GB
28GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
|
19.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 72JSZS4G72L1G9E2A7 8x31.9GB
8 of 24 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
|
87.5%
Excellent
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v21stBench 68%, 827 samples | 9x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples | 3x |
Xeon E5-2609 0IntelBench 56%, 759 samples | 2x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro M6000NvidiaBench 73%, 640 samples | 8x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 3x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $115Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 20% - Poor | Total price: $330 |