Today's hottest deals

Dynabook TECRA A50-J

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive189% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDynabook TECRA A50-J  (all builds)
MotherboardDynabook A0113/0001
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220416
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateMay 20 '22 at 14:41
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 70.2
1-Core 147
2-Core 286
89% 168 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 579
64% 505 Pts
64-Core 627
39% 627 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(3100 0009) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1934
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Lighting 20.3
Reflection 17.8
Parallax 23.7
16% 20.6 fps
MRender 16.8
Gravity 26.9
Splatting 16.4
16% 20 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg40znv512g TOSHIBA MEMORY 512GB
323GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AEJA0104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 905 885 368 367 371 372 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
189% Outstanding
Read 1,050
Write 1,229
Mixed 1,088
SusWrite 545
220% 978 MB/s
4K Read 49
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 67.4
226% 80.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,196
DQ Write 778
DQ Mixed 666
583% 880 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 189%
Great: 189%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G43AB2-CWE 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
48% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 14.2
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 14.9
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TECRA A50-J Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Dynabook TECRA A50-J

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback