Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-890FXA-UD5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics48.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-890FXA-UD5  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110211
Uptime4.4 Days
Run DateMay 20 '22 at 21:40
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1075T-$254
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 78.5
1-Core 52.2
2-Core 104
50% 78.3 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 266
28% 223 Pts
64-Core 251
16% 251 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 3979) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.9% Average
Lighting 58.5
Reflection 72.5
Parallax 63.3
48% 64.8 fps
MRender 69.2
Gravity 62.7
Splatting 58.3
51% 63.4 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra 3D 500GB-$70
376GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61170RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 273 300 294 299 298 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 339
Write 258
Mixed 231
SusWrite 288
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 35
117% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 33.1
DQ Write 87
DQ Mixed 44.1
38% 54.7 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 119%
Generic USB SD Reader 2GB
2GB free, PID 6362
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.9 9.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
3.91% Terrible
Read 8
Write 7.7
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 9.7
10% 7.65 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 3.91%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.9% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 12.3
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 8
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-890FXA-UD5 Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-890FXA-UD5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $458
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback