Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16J9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive76.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star GV62 7RD
MotherboardMSI MS-16J9  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170522
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMay 22 '22 at 12:34
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 76.3
1-Core 93
2-Core 177
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 538
54% 437 Pts
64-Core 539
33% 539 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 11C8) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4849
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
5.97% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 31.5
Parallax 5.1
6% 14.4 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 9.9
7% 8.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.97%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 190 176 62 83 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 408
Write 366
Mixed 308
SusWrite 106
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 78.8
4K Mixed 33.7
133% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 206
182% 270 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 91%
WD WD10JPLX-00MBPT0 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 130 120 129 131 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 133
Write 126
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 128
74% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC Kingston 99U5624-003.A00G 16GB
2400, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
69.2% Good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 20.7
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 19.9
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 87.6
46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16J9 Builds (Compare 3,875 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback