Today's hottest deals

HP 110-529

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 110-529  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B29
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 27 '22 at 22:11
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6410 APU R5 Graphics
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
36.3% Below average
Memory 51.5
1-Core 35.7
2-Core 68.5
33% 51.9 Pts
4-Core 126
8-Core 115
16% 120 Pts
64-Core 112
7% 112 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5
HP(103C 2B29) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.22% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 3.7
2% 3.4 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 4.2
3% 3.23 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.22%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
821GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 66 52 41 57 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
29.2% Poor
Read 51.7
Write 127
Mixed 91.5
SusWrite 49.7
60% 80.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
96% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.2% Very poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 5.8
17% 6 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 6.8
16% 5.7 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback