Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 204%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics192% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive336% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8876
Memory43.6 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 29 '22 at 02:14
Run Duration327 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$105
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 92.1
1-Core 176
2-Core 344
110% 204 Pts
4-Core 665
8-Core 992
103% 829 Pts
64-Core 1,244
77% 1,244 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 108%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
HP(103C 88D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
192% Outstanding
Lighting 280
Reflection 251
Parallax 291
228% 274 fps
MRender 314
Gravity 232
Splatting 172
188% 239 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 192%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MSI M470 1TB
696GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM13.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3813 1978 965 965 975 979 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
336% Outstanding
Read 2,095
Write 3,733
Mixed 2,321
SusWrite 1,612
553% 2,440 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 214
4K Mixed 87.9
297% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,650
DQ Write 1,123
DQ Mixed 1,452
1,066% 1,408 MB/s
Poor: 207%
This bench: 336%
Great: 504%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$169
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1180 1186 1268 1275 1293 1317 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
341% Outstanding
Read 2,563
Write 1,569
Mixed 1,689
SusWrite 1,253
394% 1,769 MB/s
4K Read 67.8
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 94
314% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,583
DQ Write 1,298
DQ Mixed 1,426
1,072% 1,436 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 341%
Great: 435%
FCCT480M500SSD1 480GB
115GB free
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 405 402 394 352 295 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 421
Write 405
Mixed 340
SusWrite 376
87% 386 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 38.5
149% 59.6 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 185
180% 285 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 100%
Great: 99%
Crucial MX300 750GB-$160
426GB free
Firmware: M0CR070
SusWrite @10s intervals: 484 484 301 295 294 295 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 412
Write 483
Mixed 393
SusWrite 359
93% 412 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 43.8
165% 65.6 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 343
257% 341 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
208GB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 88 89 89 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 86.2
Write 74.5
Mixed 72
SusWrite 88.5
109% 80.3 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
72% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 59%
WD My Book 1235 4TB
1TB free, PID 1235
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 74 77 80 79 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
34% Below average
Read 76.9
Write 70.1
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 78.5
102% 74.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
96% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 BL16G32C16U4B.M16FE1 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 BL16G32C16U4B.M16FE1 48GB
2133, 2667, 2133, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
MC Read 40.9
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 37.3
97% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 32
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 40
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 93%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-1xxx Builds (Compare 4,759 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 180%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 180%
UFO

System: HP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $860
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback