Today's hottest deals

Asus H81M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H81M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150526
Uptime20.1 Days
Run DateMay 30 '22 at 18:07
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$104
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 107
2-Core 169
74% 122 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 568
57% 462 Pts
64-Core 569
35% 569 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Zotac(19DA 2372) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.7% Average
Lighting 60.4
Reflection 70.9
Parallax 66.4
49% 65.9 fps
MRender 69.4
Gravity 62.5
Splatting 56.1
51% 62.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SP900 256GB-$300
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.8.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 70 76 76 51 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 372
Write 212
Mixed 200
SusWrite 72.9
47% 214 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 92.8
4K Mixed 20.8
89% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 100
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 178
129% 162 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 89%
Toshiba HDWD240 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: KQ000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 172 173 173 173 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 179
Write 168
Mixed 68
SusWrite 163
32% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 0.6
7% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 20%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$47
121GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 97 106 106 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 162
Write 140
Mixed 32
SusWrite 103
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 76%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Value DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
57.6% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 17.2
56% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 18.8
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,973 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-PLUS - $98

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback