Today's hottest deals

Vultr HFC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemVultr HFC  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory0.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime15.5 Days
Run DateJun 01 '22 at 01:58
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core (Skylake, IBRS)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Memory 53.3
1-Core 98.8
2-Core 99.4
51% 83.8 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 108
14% 107 Pts
64-Core 106
7% 106 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 95%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 69GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 834
Write 1019
Mixed 869
204% 908 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 34.6
4K Mixed 23.8
76% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 85.3
DQ Write 77.5
DQ Mixed 80.4
61% 81.1 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
58.3% Above average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 20.3
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 17.7
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback