Today's hottest deals

Koloe X58

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemIntel Thurley
MotherboardKoloe X58  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 8.00098 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190731
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 04 '22 at 21:42
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5660
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 68
2-Core 123
60% 93.8 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 382
39% 313 Pts
64-Core 509
32% 509 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01c45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 86 91 106 92 77 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.3% Below average
Read 203
Write 98.5
Mixed 135
SusWrite 90.1
29% 132 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 46.1
4K Mixed 15.6
67% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 107
85% 118 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 88%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB
4.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 28 28 27 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
24.9% Poor
Read 31.4
Write 26.2
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 27.4
37% 27.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1.5
210% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MXIC 25L8005 41GB
4266, 33 MHz
8192, 33792 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
38.8% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 11.8
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 11
32% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X58 Builds (Compare 517 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Koloe X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback