Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator PT314-51s

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics75.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive188% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Predator PT314-51s  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Clubman_TLM
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210723
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 05 '22 at 02:14
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11375H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 70.5
1-Core 151
2-Core 289
91% 170 Pts
4-Core 459
8-Core 667
70% 563 Pts
64-Core 712
44% 712 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Acer(1025 1526) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2197 MHz, MLim: 3090 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.6% Very good
Lighting 91.1
Reflection 136
Parallax 85.3
74% 104 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 92.9
Splatting 81.3
78% 97.8 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 105%
Intel Iris Xe
Acer(1025 1525) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9219
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Lighting 29.8
Reflection 29.5
Parallax 34.2
24% 31.2 fps
MRender 25.3
Gravity 38.8
Splatting 0.3
16% 21.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLB512HBJQ-00007 512GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7202Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 255 240 236 226 222 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1,914
Write 384
Mixed 1,344
SusWrite 268
215% 978 MB/s
4K Read 53.7
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 67.6
221% 73.9 MB/s
DQ Read 835
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 669
470% 607 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 188%
Great: 320%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 Kingston ACR32D4S2S1ME-8 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
79% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 33.4
MC Mixed 23.5
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 37.8
SC Mixed 19.1
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 79%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PT314-51s Builds (Compare 555 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Acer Predator PT314-51s

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback