Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator PH315-53

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics33.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator PH315-53  (all builds)
MotherboardCML QX50_CMS
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210821
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 05 '22 at 15:44
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10870H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 0.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
48.3% Average
Memory 75.7
1-Core 71.9
2-Core 39.4
46% 62.3 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 109
16% 118 Pts
64-Core 140
9% 140 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Acer(1025 1442) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6179
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.4% Below average
Lighting 12
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 119
10% 44 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 90.3
Splatting 83.2
79% 99.4 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON SA2000M 500GB
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 260 242 482 533 531 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 916
Write 1,200
Mixed 641
SusWrite 380
176% 784 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 49.8
4K Mixed 42.9
129% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 170
127% 171 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 108%
Great: 268%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
439GB free
Firmware: ACM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 128 129 126 125 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 75.1
Write 105
Mixed 56.4
SusWrite 128
67% 91.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
124% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.M16FR Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
28.2% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 7.7
24% 8.37 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 14.9
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PH315-53 Builds (Compare 6,301 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-53

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback