Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	65.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 4,306 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	68.9% Good	Memory 77.4 1-Core 84 2-Core 173 64% 111 Pts	4-Core 325 8-Core 614 56% 470 Pts	64-Core 1,577 98% 1,577 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 71%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK256MAY-1A 256GB 258 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 160GB free (System drive) Firmware: M504 SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 198 197 191 238 309 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	65.9% Good	Read 389 Write 319 Mixed 153 SusWrite 231 61% 273 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 53.3 4K Mixed 21 89% 32.1 MB/s	DQ Read 246 DQ Write 181 DQ Mixed 166 137% 198 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18JSF51272PZ-1G9K Samsung M393B5270DH0-CK0 18JSF51272PZ-1G9K Samsung M393B5270DH0-CK0 Samsung M393B5270QB0-CMA 18JSF51272PZ-1G9K Samsung M393B5270DH0-CK0 18JSF51272PZ-1G9K 18JSF51272PZ-1G9K Samsung M393B... 64GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 1866, 1600, 1866, 1600, 1866, 1866, 1600, 1866, 1866, 1600, 1866, 1600, 1600, 1866, 1600, 1866 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	89.7% Excellent	MC Read 40.2 MC Write 35.8 MC Mixed 33.5 104% 36.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 7.2 24% 8.5 GB/s	Latency 85.5 47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 104%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	145x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	114x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	87x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	145x
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	139x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	65x

RAM
M393B2G70DB0-CMA 16x16GBSamsungBench 101%, 41 samples	25x
M391B5173QH0-CMA 8x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 111 samples	19x
M393B1G70QH0-CMA 4x8GBSamsungBench 82%, 512 samples	18x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16