Alienware ASM200

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	79.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago.

System	Alienware ASM200 (all builds)
Motherboard	Alienware 0WJ7WM
Memory	10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200629
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 09 '22 at 05:42
Run Duration	186 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-6100T-$108 6,076 User benchmarks, average bench 58% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	56.1% Above average	Memory 73.3 1-Core 88.8 2-Core 156 62% 106 Pts	4-Core 227 8-Core 225 30% 226 Pts	64-Core 237 15% 237 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 M470X 31 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Dell(1028 072C) 2GB CLim: 950 MHz, MLim: 1550 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.6 Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	17.5% Very poor	Lighting 21.7 Reflection 23.9 Parallax 28.3 18% 24.6 fps	MRender 20.4 Gravity 20.8 Splatting 21.8 17% 21 fps
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 22%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
THNSF81Q60CSE 1.5TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: DABB SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 213 213 212 215 219 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	79.6% Very good	Read 370 Write 388 Mixed 356 SusWrite 214 75% 332 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 72.6 4K Mixed 34.7 117% 43.3 MB/s	DQ Read 364 DQ Write 320 DQ Mixed 196 187% 294 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 80%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA82GS6MFR8N-TF 1x16GB 4,427 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 1 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 12 37% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 13.7 SC Mixed 13.1 36% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 94.1 42% 94.1 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ASM200 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

System: Alienware ASM200

CPU
Core i3-6100TIntel $108Bench 58%, 6,076 samples	11x
Core i5-6400TIntelBench 61%, 8,631 samples	7x
Core i7-6700TIntelBench 70%, 9,225 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon R9 M470XAMDBench 21%, 104 samples	20x
Radeon R9 M470XAMDBench 21%, 31 samples	1x

SSD
M.2 PCIe SSD 2TBSpccBench 351%, 3,733 samples	2x
THNSF81Q60CSE 1.5TBBench 74%, 2 samples	2x
Micron_M500DC_MTFDDAK240MBB 240GBBench 79%, 66 samples	1x

RAM
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 38%, 45,898 samples	7x
HMA82GS6MFR8N-TF 1x16GBHynixBench 38%, 4,427 samples	4x
16ATF1G64HZ-2G1B1 1x8GBMicronBench 39%, 4,454 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $108

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16