Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	0.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	98.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	3.99GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3.99GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4 3 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	76.9% Very good	Memory 82.7 1-Core 104 2-Core 208 75% 132 Pts	4-Core 411 8-Core 410 55% 411 Pts	64-Core 413 26% 413 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GRID M60-2Q 84 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 114E) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.41 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	0.89% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 1.15 Parallax 0.94 1% 1.03 fps	MRender 1.43 Gravity 1 Splatting 1.3 1% 1.24 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 0.89% Great: 51%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
XEN PV DISK 107GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0000 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	98.4% Outstanding	Read 476 Write 517 Mixed 513 112% 502 MB/s	4K Read 54.6 4K Write 54.7 4K Mixed 30.5 151% 46.6 MB/s	DQ Read 69 DQ Write 71.8 DQ Mixed 31.8 34% 57.5 MB/s
Poor: 97% ↑ This bench: 98.4% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x3GB 511 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1 of 1 slots used 3GB DIMM RAM Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	MC Read 38 MC Write 35.4 MC Mixed 47.4 115% 40.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 17.5 SC Mixed 18.7 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 75.7 53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 90%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 60%

Destroyer

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 55%

Gunboat

CPU
Xeon E5-2623 v4IntelBench 59%, 42 samples	16x
Xeon Gold 5315YIntelBench 71%, 25 samples	14x
Xeon Silver 4215RIntelBench 62%, 17 samples	13x

GPU
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples	9x
RTX A4000NvidiaBench 132%, 4,246 samples	7x
Quadro RTX 5000NvidiaBench 131%, 1,749 samples	6x

SSD
PVDISK 268GBXensrcBench 53%, 95 samples	53x
PVDISK 2TBXensrcBench 50%, 16 samples	5x
Virtual Disk 107GBMicrosoftBench 60%, 85 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16