Today's hottest deals

HP 240 G7 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive143% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 83% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemHP 240 G7 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 868A
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 10 '22 at 11:17
Run Duration290 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU7%
CPU Throttled 83%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 84
1-Core 124
2-Core 238
83% 149 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 520
57% 449 Pts
64-Core 518
32% 518 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
HP(103C 868A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8853
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
2.79% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 8.8
3% 6.13 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 0
Splatting 0
2% 2.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.79%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CL1-8D256-HP 256GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: L182
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 209 222 212 208 202 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
143% Outstanding
Read 1,838
Write 707
Mixed 347
SusWrite 205
168% 774 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 18.5
145% 65.9 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 383
275% 353 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 143%
Great: 172%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1P26KC8T1-BAAS 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
46.5% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 12.8
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 13.7
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 240 G7 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 883 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 240 G7 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback