Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	97.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$163 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	80.8% Excellent	Memory 83.8 1-Core 114 2-Core 227 80% 142 Pts	4-Core 420 8-Core 617 65% 518 Pts	64-Core 615 38% 615 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Asus(1043 84BB) CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Lighting 21 Reflection 18.2 Parallax 20.5 17% 19.9 fps	MRender 25.3 Gravity 22.7 Splatting 0.3 12% 16.1 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 19%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CV3-CE256 256GB 1,018 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 202GB free (System drive) Firmware: TC81202 SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 197 214 176 158 169 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	97.4% Outstanding	Read 478 Write 380 Mixed 356 SusWrite 198 79% 353 MB/s	4K Read 40.5 4K Write 78.1 4K Mixed 49.9 167% 56.2 MB/s	DQ Read 356 DQ Write 282 DQ Mixed 288 224% 308 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 97.4% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 2x8GB 6,881 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40.5% Average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 11.7 38% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 12.3 36% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 73.8 54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 76%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	16x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	4x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $45Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	5x
AS510S 256GBApacerBench 69%, 233 samples	3x
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	2x

RAM
M378A1G43DB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 6,175 samples	4x
TS1GLH64V4B 2x8GBTranscendBench 76%, 97 samples	3x
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 73%, 22,760 samples	3x

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $208