Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	81.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

23 months ago, 23 months ago.

PC Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4125 2,594 User benchmarks, average bench 35% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	42.2% Average	Memory 43.6 1-Core 60 2-Core 117 41% 73.6 Pts	4-Core 236 8-Core 229 31% 233 Pts	64-Core 236 15% 236 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1E50 8003) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6813 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	2.17% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 2.7 Parallax 2.4 2% 2.43 fps	MRender 3.8 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 4.2 3% 3.47 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.17% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Vick 128G 128GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFQBB.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 325 344 349 364 382 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	81.6% Excellent	Read 349 Write 322 Mixed 323 SusWrite 349 76% 336 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 65.7 4K Mixed 32.7 111% 40.4 MB/s	DQ Read 236 DQ Write 293 DQ Mixed 182 160% 237 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x4GB 783 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	29.4% Poor	MC Read 11.6 MC Write 10.3 MC Mixed 12.9 33% 11.6 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 3 SC Mixed 4.7 10% 3.5 GB/s	Latency 186 22% 186 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J4125IntelBench 35%, 2,594 samples	67x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	67x

RAM
123456789012345678 2x4GBABCDBench 24%, 783 samples	53x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	14x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16