Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E7500-$109 39,897 User benchmarks, average bench 39% CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	42.7% Average	Memory 70.7 1-Core 46.1 2-Core 89.9 44% 68.9 Pts	4-Core 88.4 8-Core 89.5 12% 88.9 Pts	64-Core 92.9 6% 92.9 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 45%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Виртуальный диск (Майкрософт) 64GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 15 16 16 15 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	25.3% Poor	Read 72.2 Write 29.3 Mixed 38.3 SusWrite 15.7 29% 38.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 58%
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150 10,092 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 184GB free Firmware: JPFOA3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 17 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	12% Very poor	Read 25.6 Write 39.9 Mixed 20.9 SusWrite 15.9 19% 25.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 72% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM SDRAM Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	15.8% Very poor	MC Read 5.2 MC Write 5.2 MC Mixed 4.1 14% 4.83 GB/s	SC Read 3.9 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 3.7 11% 4 GB/s	Latency 99.8 40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Quad Q8300Intel $131Bench 44%, 20,482 samples	8x
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	5x
Pentium E5700Intel $22Bench 36%, 20,872 samples	4x

GPU
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	9x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	5x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	3x

SSD
120GB 120GBNetacBench 61%, 1,949 samples	3x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $131