Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

23 months ago, 23 months ago.

PC Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4020 SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	26.8% Poor	Memory 37.3 1-Core 55.9 2-Core 85.9 35% 59.7 Pts	4-Core 91.4 8-Core 115 13% 103 Pts	64-Core 120 7% 120 Pts

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1DC2 2203) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.75% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 2.2 2% 1.9 fps	MRender 2.8 Gravity 2 Splatting 3.4 2% 2.73 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.75% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Biwin CNF82NS1F00-128 128GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0910A0R SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 112 17 20 13 10 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	34.1% Below average	Read 349 Write 323 Mixed 298 SusWrite 60.1 58% 258 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 46.5 4K Mixed 0.8 45% 19.9 MB/s	DQ Read 66.7 DQ Write 134 DQ Mixed 1.1 29% 67.3 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
DDR4 123456789012345678 2x4GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	19.5% Very poor	MC Read 5.1 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 7.8 21% 7.27 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 4 11% 3.73 GB/s	Latency 215 19% 215 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 31%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4020IntelBench 27%, 1 sample	1x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	1x

SSD
CNF82NS1F00-128 128GBBiwinBench 46%, 4 samples	1x

RAM
123456789012345678 2x4GBDDR4Bench 15%, 7 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16