Today's hottest deals

Asus X99-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics21.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive227% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-E  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 21 '22 at 13:08
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 85.8
1-Core 113
2-Core 229
80% 143 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 690
70% 568 Pts
64-Core 888
55% 888 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$75
CLim: 1250 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
21.5% Poor
Lighting 26.8
Reflection 29.1
Parallax 34.8
22% 30.2 fps
MRender 28.4
Gravity 30.3
Splatting 20
21% 26.2 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$71
239GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1874 1850 1858 1239 171 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
227% Outstanding
Read 1,219
Write 1,739
Mixed 1,358
SusWrite 1,188
312% 1,376 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 78.2
237% 83.7 MB/s
DQ Read 882
DQ Write 515
DQ Mixed 729
535% 709 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 227%
Great: 295%
WD Black 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$42
297GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 105 107 106 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 103
Write 78.8
Mixed 61.1
SusWrite 106
64% 87.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 60%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$33
621GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 144 143 144 146 147 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 130
Write 108
Mixed 93.4
SusWrite 144
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
69.8% Good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 23.4
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 21.2
SC Mixed 21.6
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E Builds (Compare 565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $385
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback