HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1850
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 21 '22 at 22:47
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5500B APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
45.7% Average
Memory 62.1
1-Core 64.7
2-Core 108
48% 78.2 Pts
4-Core 169
8-Core 181
23% 175 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7560D
HP(103C 1850) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.1001
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
3.37% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 4.5
3% 4.4 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 4
Splatting 5.8
4% 4.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.37%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 92 49 87 64 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 234
Write 325
Mixed 308
SusWrite 83.1
54% 238 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 16.4
90% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 30.3
62% 124 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 78%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: GG2OAC90
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 49 50 51 50 48 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 104
Write 39.3
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 49.1
41% 56.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 58%
Seagate ST3500630NS EIT 500GB
430GB free
Firmware: 3.AEH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 74 77 77 76 76 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 68
Write 52.2
Mixed 47.2
SusWrite 76
45% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
H 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
21.3% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 7
20% 6.97 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 7.5
19% 6.53 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6305 SFF Builds (Compare 484 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback