Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive170% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte A320M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '22 at 04:00
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 73.3
1-Core 122
2-Core 239
79% 145 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 761
74% 606 Pts
64-Core 1110
69% 1110 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 89%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$95
254GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 837 339 263 258 260 424 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 1,463
Write 1,452
Mixed 1156
SusWrite 397
250% 1,117 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 94.9
4K Mixed 56.7
183% 63.7 MB/s
DQ Read 827
DQ Write 506
DQ Mixed 687
506% 673 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 170%
Great: 237%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
82GB free
Firmware: 13057113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 56 42 44 49 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 69.5
Write 98.6
Mixed 44.8
SusWrite 56.7
50% 67.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
145% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5702-089.A00G 9905702-120.A00G 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
84% Excellent
MC Read 34
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 29.2
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 24.6
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 93.9
43% 93.9 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 84%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,925 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $233
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback