Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16R5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics38.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GF63 Thin 10SC
MotherboardMSI MS-16R5  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210311
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 27 '22 at 03:14
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Memory 89.2
1-Core 116
2-Core 201
79% 135 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 730
67% 558 Pts
64-Core 898
56% 898 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
MSI(1462 12F4) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.9729
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Lighting 48.1
Reflection 72.4
Parallax 46.1
39% 55.5 fps
MRender 54.6
Gravity 45.7
Splatting 41.8
38% 47.4 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3256B-AI1 256GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 94.5
Write 635
Mixed 62
60% 264 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 29.2
4K Mixed 9
37% 14.9 MB/s
DQ Read 439
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 214
188% 287 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 211%
General USB Flash Disk 248GB
123GB free
Firmware: 1100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 14 95 9.3 32 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 375
Write 158
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 41.5
31% 145 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 13.4
4K Mixed 10.3
39% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 19.8
DQ Write 37.3
DQ Mixed 14.3
15% 23.8 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 01BA M4S08S681JGGG39-12 16GB
3200, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.1% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 15.6
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 10.4
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16R5 Builds (Compare 5,057 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback