HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 17-cd0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive20.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 17-cd0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 85FF
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 28 '22 at 23:57
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 103
2-Core 188
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 510
54% 432 Pts
64-Core 607
38% 607 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 85FF) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.42% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 6.3
0% 5.17 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 10
7% 8.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 2.42%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apricorn 120GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0128
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 32 39 43 20 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Read 179
Write 81.1
Mixed 66.6
SusWrite 35.4
20% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 11.6
4K Mixed 8.7
33% 10.2 MB/s
DQ Read 14.7
DQ Write 20.1
DQ Mixed 11
10% 15.3 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6JJR8N-VK 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
42.7% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 13
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 12.1
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Laptop 17-cd0xxx Builds (Compare 1,061 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 17-cd0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback