Today's hottest deals

Dell OptiPlex 755

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell OptiPlex 755
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 755  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 30 '22 at 16:12
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E6550-$18
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
38.2% Below average
Memory 68.3
1-Core 29.8
2-Core 59.2
36% 52.4 Pts
4-Core 51.5
8-Core 49.1
7% 50.3 Pts
64-Core 41.5
3% 41.5 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Gigabyte(1458 3525) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.69% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 0.3
Parallax 0.6
0% 0.5 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.4
1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.69%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS722080K9A300 80GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DCBOC7AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 33 40 34 13 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Read 30
Write 24.2
Mixed 24
SusWrite 28.3
20% 26.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 32%
Hitachi HTS721080G9SA00 80GB
67GB free
Firmware: MC4OC10H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 31 31 30 30 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 39.5
Write 29.7
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 29
22% 30.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
null MHz
1024, 2048, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.3% Very poor
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 3.2
10% 3.47 GB/s
SC Read 0.8
SC Write 1.7
SC Mixed 1.9
4% 1.47 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 755 Builds (Compare 505 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 755

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $75
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback