Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7Y75 2,904 User benchmarks, average bench 44% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	32.5% Below average	Memory 52.5 1-Core 37.8 2-Core 59.5 33% 49.9 Pts	4-Core 70.4 8-Core 93.6 10% 82 Pts	64-Core 101 6% 101 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 615 (Mobile Kaby Lake) 11,115 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Dell(1028 077A) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8935 Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	2.43% Terrible	Lighting 2.6 Reflection 3.2 Parallax 3.4 2% 3.07 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 2.8 Splatting 4.2 3% 3.67 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.43% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team TM8PS7512G 512GB 5,734 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 433GB free (System drive) Firmware: U0503A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 210 243 267 263 351 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	Read 372 Write 326 Mixed 280 SusWrite 263 70% 310 MB/s	4K Read 14.7 4K Write 42.1 4K Mixed 14.4 63% 23.7 MB/s	DQ Read 148 DQ Write 170 DQ Mixed 40.7 63% 120 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung K4EBE304EB-EGCF 2x8GB 5,177 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	46.1% Average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 21.2 MC Mixed 17.1 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 10.2 28% 9.8 GB/s	Latency 152 26% 152 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 66%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 615 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 3%, 11,115 samples	484x
UHD Graphics 615IntelBench 4%, 2,909 samples	108x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	4x

SSD
THNSN5256GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshibaBench 109%, 23,829 samples	47x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba $33Bench 145%, 33,719 samples	44x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 184%, 7,214 samples	43x

RAM
K4EBE304EB-EGCF 2x8GBSamsungBench 59%, 5,177 samples	136x
MT52L1G32D4PG-107 2x8GBMicronBench 56%, 2,777 samples	129x
K4E6E304EB-EGCF 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 7,516 samples	78x