Today's hottest deals

To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180629
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 01 '22 at 04:42
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G620-$30
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Memory 83.8
1-Core 66.7
2-Core 131
58% 93.8 Pts
4-Core 127
8-Core 113
16% 120 Pts
64-Core 102
6% 102 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Intel(8086 2010) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 1
1% 1 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 1.8
2% 1.87 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$51
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 55 117 105 25 68 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.3% Below average
Read 199
Write 143
Mixed 146
SusWrite 90.5
32% 145 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 18.4
4K Mixed 15.4
54% 16.8 MB/s
DQ Read 19
DQ Write 25.7
DQ Mixed 20.2
16% 21.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 55%
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB-$40
294GB free
Firmware: ES2OA60W
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 83 85 86 84 86 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 76.3
Write 62.3
Mixed 45
SusWrite 83.8
49% 66.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix SRT4G86U1-H9H 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.7% Poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 6.1
18% 6.33 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 6.5
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,800 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback