Gigabyte GA-B250M-D2VX-SI-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte B250M-D2VX-SI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B250M-D2VX-SI-CF  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 03 '22 at 11:22
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4600-$27
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
66.1% Good
Memory 80.1
1-Core 110
2-Core 204
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 303
40% 302 Pts
64-Core 300
19% 300 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1994
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
3.92% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 7.2
5% 5.43 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 0.2
2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.92%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WT200-128G 128GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1030A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 248 232 249 204 180 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 422
Write 318
Mixed 304
SusWrite 227
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 8.9
125% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 13.3
64% 140 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SP008GBLFU240B02 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
42.6% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 11.7
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 11.3
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B250M-D2VX-SI-CF Builds (Compare 106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B250M-D2VX-SI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback