Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3047h
Memory13.1 GB free of 16.001 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 03 '22 at 13:13
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 79%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 B24
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
43.7% Average
Memory 76.7
1-Core 44.4
2-Core 46.4
41% 55.8 Pts
4-Core 63.8
8-Core 75.2
9% 69.5 Pts
64-Core 79.2
5% 79.2 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI FirePro (FireGL) Graphics Adapter
AMD(1002 2002) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.82% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.53 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.3
1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.82%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 128GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 185 185 186 184 192 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42% Average
Read 209
Write 188
Mixed 170
SusWrite 186
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 43.2
4K Mixed 14.1
58% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 71.1
DQ Mixed 99.5
76% 104 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 42%
Great: 73%
WD Re 2TB (2012)-$30
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01K02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 152 154 154 154 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 143
Write 130
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 153
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 90%
WD My Passport 25E1 3TB
688GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 24 24 23 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 21.5
Write 21.9
Mixed 19
SusWrite 23.1
29% 21.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B5173BH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M378B5173QH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M378B5173BH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M378B5173QH0-CK0 49GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 33792 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.5% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 10
25% 8.87 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 8.2
19% 6.53 GB/s
Latency 87
46% 87 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC Builds (Compare 269 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback