Today's hottest deals

Asus G56JR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus G56JR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G56JR
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140902
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 03 '22 at 20:10
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 80.4
1-Core 94.6
2-Core 180
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 492
50% 405 Pts
64-Core 489
30% 489 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760M
Asus(1043 22CA) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Lighting 13
Reflection 13.4
Parallax 16.4
11% 14.3 fps
MRender 16.1
Gravity 16.6
Splatting 12.4
12% 15 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$47
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 415 428 428 429 428 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 332
Write 404
Mixed 362
SusWrite 428
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 68.2
4K Mixed 46.2
146% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 150
171% 292 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 101%
Great: 125%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
688GB free
Firmware: RXM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 151 153 165 160 155 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 93.2
Write 114
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 156
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.2% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 16.8
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 18.6
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G56JR Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G56JR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $400
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback