Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-14C1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive81.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 78% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemMicro-Star Prestige 14 A10SC
MotherboardMSI MS-14C1  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200518
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 06 '22 at 00:25
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User ECU-User
Background CPU 34%
CPU Throttled 78%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 74.4
1-Core 90.5
2-Core 187
66% 117 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 499
49% 400 Pts
64-Core 521
32% 521 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 1297) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
5.7% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 54.6
Parallax 2
5% 21 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 8.9
7% 8.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.7%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ADATA_IM2P33F8-128GD 128GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1026E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 47 360 130 230 187 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 937
Write 47
Mixed 89.1
SusWrite 206
68% 320 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 26.5
4K Mixed 8.9
45% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 299
DQ Write 520
DQ Mixed 205
213% 341 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 153%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9CCNNNCLGALAR-NVD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.5% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 19.8
66% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 19
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 91.6
44% 91.6 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-14C1 Builds (Compare 206 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-14C1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback