Today's hottest deals

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0409

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive288% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemRazer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0409  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH570
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210924
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 06 '22 at 06:13
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
43.4% Average
Memory 41.1
1-Core 73.3
2-Core 135
46% 83.1 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 346
37% 297 Pts
64-Core 524
32% 524 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1A58 2018) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9778
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.92% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 30
Parallax 2.5
2% 11.6 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2.5
2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 1.92%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TB
870GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7401Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1562 1737 1936 2015 1870 1621 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
288% Outstanding
Read 1,665
Write 2,002
Mixed 1,866
SusWrite 1,790
414% 1,831 MB/s
4K Read 64.7
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 91
288% 98.2 MB/s
DQ Read 620
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 435
338% 471 MB/s
Poor: 192%
This bench: 288%
Great: 444%
Seagate Firecuda 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: STLS1020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 489 419 115 116 115 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 958
Write 388
Mixed 668
SusWrite 228
124% 560 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 7.4
56% 13.9 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 294%
G-drive SSD 1TB
169GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 330 362 407 342 310 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 353
Write 89.2
Mixed 186
SusWrite 328
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 9.4
64% 15.9 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Gold Key Co Ltd NMSO480E82-3200E 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
MC Read 36.8
MC Write 35.1
MC Mixed 30.3
97% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 9.8
36% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 197
20% 197 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade 15 Advanced Model (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0409 Builds (Compare 1,491 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0409

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback