Today's hottest deals

Asus STRIX Z270H GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive76.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270H GAMING  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161108
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJul 06 '22 at 13:04
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$127
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 95.8
1-Core 127
2-Core 232
87% 152 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 673
69% 555 Pts
64-Core 687
42% 687 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 173
Reflection 194
Parallax 186
141% 184 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 186
Splatting 128
122% 151 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 127%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 275GB-$42
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 217 151 150 307 405 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 432
Write 149
Mixed 179
SusWrite 282
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 99.2
4K Mixed 23.8
117% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 146
112% 153 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 95%
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$75
71GB free
Firmware: X2306RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 287 291 272 290 262 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 291
Mixed 213
SusWrite 282
71% 320 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 92.5
4K Mixed 35.9
141% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 124
126% 209 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 91%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
112GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 292 293 293 292 290 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 484
Mixed 405
SusWrite 311
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 60.7
204% 71.4 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 361
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 119%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
240GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 135 133 136 136 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 115
Write 110
Mixed 62
SusWrite 135
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 36.6
MC Mixed 28.5
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 40.3
SC Mixed 29.5
87% 30.6 GB/s
Latency 54.6
73% 54.6 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270H GAMING Builds (Compare 3,399 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270H GAMING - $247

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $735
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $337WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback