Kouziro FRONTIERDT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemKouziro FRONTIERDT  (all builds)
MotherboardECS H77H2-M4
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120924
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 08 '22 at 11:54
Run Duration281 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 102
2-Core 190
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 477
51% 406 Pts
64-Core 497
31% 497 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Lighting 21.4
Reflection 26.3
Parallax 30.3
17% 26 fps
MRender 32.3
Gravity 25.5
Splatting 0.1
14% 19.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
487GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 61 44 49 47 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
45% Average
Read 108
Write 106
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 48.2
63% 84.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 45%
Great: 85%
BUFFALO HD-PCGU3-A 2TB
2TB free, PID 02c0
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 138 126 138 138 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 130
Write 116
Mixed 56
SusWrite 134
144% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.6
162% 2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 240D38G628MTKLME Kingston 99U5471-039.A00LF 86E9 SMD-8G28NP-16K Kingston 99U5471-056.A00LF 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.7% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 17.3
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 18.9
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FRONTIERDT Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Kouziro FRONTIERDT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $390
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback