MSI MS-1771

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive88.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star GS70 2OD
MotherboardMSI MS-1771  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 13 '22 at 03:13
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 77.1
1-Core 64.3
2-Core 122
54% 87.8 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 363
36% 292 Pts
64-Core 357
22% 357 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 143 143 142 144 143 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 449
Write 427
Mixed 290
SusWrite 166
74% 333 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 72.5
4K Mixed 43.8
152% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 261
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 172
167% 260 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 108%
USSD USSD 4TB
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 10 9.3 9.7 9.9 9.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
3.78% Terrible
Read 6
Write 0.7
Mixed 2
SusWrite 8.7
6% 4.35 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.78%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2S8G64CC8HB5N-DI 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
53.3% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 16
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 16.6
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 86.1
46% 86.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-1771 Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1771

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback