Medion P15609

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMedion P15609  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION NH55RAQM1
Memory0.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190918
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateJul 13 '22 at 21:52
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 85.1
1-Core 109
2-Core 214
77% 136 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 606
62% 501 Pts
64-Core 601
37% 601 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 8560) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1659
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
43.7% Average
Lighting 56.8
Reflection 62.6
Parallax 56.1
46% 58.5 fps
MRender 41.8
Gravity 50.2
Splatting 48.7
39% 46.9 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
E12-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B16-BB1 1TB
285GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 492 478 526 552 543 406 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 1,196
Write 2,167
Mixed 1,238
SusWrite 499
288% 1,275 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 55
173% 62.6 MB/s
DQ Read 785
DQ Write 580
DQ Mixed 658
498% 674 MB/s
Poor: 163%
This bench: 163%
Great: 253%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.4% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 11
36% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 10.5
32% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P15609 Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Medion P15609

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback