Acer Predator PO7-640

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 234%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 121%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 280%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 122%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics196% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive256% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 91% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAcer Predator PO7-640  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator PO7-640
Memory57.4 GB free of 64 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 19 '22 at 07:27
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 91%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$255
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
122% Outstanding
Memory 85
1-Core 217
2-Core 446
128% 249 Pts
4-Core 851
8-Core 1,642
148% 1,246 Pts
64-Core 3,056
189% 3,056 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 122%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$550
Sapphire(174B A612) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 472.80
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
196% Outstanding
Lighting 286
Reflection 261
Parallax 295
233% 281 fps
MRender 322
Gravity 238
Splatting 177
193% 246 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 196%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1114 512GB
339GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21113000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 609 476 418 419 421 417 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
256% Outstanding
Read 1,766
Write 1,628
Mixed 1,388
SusWrite 460
293% 1,310 MB/s
4K Read 59
4K Write 264
4K Mixed 91
346% 138 MB/s
DQ Read 1,254
DQ Write 1,055
DQ Mixed 1,002
792% 1,103 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 256%
Great: 235%
Nvme XPG GAMMIX S50 Lite 1TB
439GB free
Firmware: 82C6U67A Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 625 607 618 613 636 638 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
275% Outstanding
Read 2,781
Write 622
Mixed 796
SusWrite 623
262% 1,205 MB/s
4K Read 53.4
4K Write 192
4K Mixed 84.2
290% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,011
DQ Write 605
DQ Mixed 828
611% 815 MB/s
Poor: 184%
This bench: 275%
Great: 453%
Asmt 2235 1TB
756GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 448 448 447 448 450 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 450
Mixed 425
SusWrite 448
102% 451 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 40.5
137% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 174
129% 169 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 97%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 180 178 172 182 181 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 174
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 178
101% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
150% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
Seagate One Touch HDD 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 129 131 130 129 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 109
Write 126
Mixed 68.1
SusWrite 128
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.6
196% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT32GX5M2B5200C40 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
174% Outstanding
MC Read 70.4
MC Write 67.2
MC Mixed 65.2
193% 67.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 54.2
SC Mixed 34.8
106% 37 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 122%
This bench: 174%
Great: 177%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PO7-640 Builds (Compare 330 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 214%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 251%
UFO

System: Acer Predator PO7-640

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $805
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback