Casper EXCALIBUR G770

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

21 months ago, 21 months ago.

System	Casper EXCALIBUR G770 (all builds)
Motherboard	CASPER G770 001
Memory	9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20200316
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 19 '22 at 19:33
Run Duration	217 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	28%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9300H 116,682 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	64% Good	Memory 73.5 1-Core 118 2-Core 167 70% 119 Pts	4-Core 297 8-Core 411 45% 354 Pts	64-Core 409 25% 409 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Quanta(152D 1199) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340 Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	4.06% Terrible	Lighting 6 Reflection 57.5 Parallax 7 5% 23.5 fps	MRender 4.7 Gravity 5.4 Splatting 0.1 2% 3.4 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.06% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB 27,523 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 176GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 151 67 52 109 58 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	64.6% Good	Read 235 Write 118 Mixed 314 SusWrite 107 43% 193 MB/s	4K Read 30.4 4K Write 62.1 4K Mixed 30.4 118% 41 MB/s	DQ Read 287 DQ Write 283 DQ Mixed 45.3 100% 205 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 91%
Toshiba HDWL110 1TB 7,333 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 866GB free Firmware: JU000A SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 100 114 108 120 120 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	67.3% Good	Read 122 Write 136 Mixed 47.7 SusWrite 111 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 0.5 205% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA266.C8FE 1x16GB 861 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.8% Below average	MC Read 10.4 MC Write 10.2 MC Mixed 10.3 29% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 8.4 SC Mixed 11 27% 9.3 GB/s	Latency 93.6 43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EXCALIBUR G770 Builds (Compare 3,267 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Casper EXCALIBUR G770

CPU
Core i5-10300HIntelBench 74%, 82,821 samples	714x
Core i5-11400HIntelBench 80%, 35,470 samples	631x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples	536x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	738x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	454x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 25,082 samples	351x

SSD
P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBCrucial $45Bench 166%, 55,360 samples	646x
SA400M8240G 240GBKingstonBench 70%, 27,523 samples	376x
SSD 500GBKioxia-exceriaBench 175%, 10,941 samples	323x

RAM
CT16G4SFRA32A.M16FRS 1x16GBCrucialBench 44%, 1,443 samples	469x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 1x8GBMicronBench 38%, 20,126 samples	255x
CT16G4SFRA32A.C8FE 1x16GBCrucialBench 45%, 941 samples	197x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $45

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16