Asus H110M-CS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive72.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H110M-CS  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190703
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 22 '22 at 06:23
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$89
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 99.3
2-Core 205
72% 128 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 387
51% 383 Pts
64-Core 392
24% 392 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 73%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TD128GMMC-00000 128GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0415A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 227 244 236 111 40 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 448
Write 370
Mixed 372
SusWrite 180
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 19.7
114% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 36.7
84% 170 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 73%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45
931GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 78 69 68 47 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 183
Write 178
Mixed 32
SusWrite 71.2
84% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
136% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
42.4% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 12.7
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.4
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-CS Builds (Compare 901 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H110M-CS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $176
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback