HP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8704
Memory36.3 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210827
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 24 '22 at 00:56
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 10600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700F-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Memory 84.1
1-Core 142
2-Core 254
89% 160 Pts
4-Core 505
8-Core 806
81% 656 Pts
64-Core 1,110
69% 1,110 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
HP(103C 8702) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 110
Parallax 125
101% 119 fps
MRender 180
Gravity 110
Splatting 102
104% 131 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1006 512GB
135GB free
Firmware: 20120006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 891 552 543 518 523 495 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
189% Outstanding
Read 1158
Write 1,267
Mixed 1,049
SusWrite 587
228% 1,015 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 60.8
206% 74.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,095
DQ Write 839
DQ Mixed 966
723% 967 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 189%
Great: 219%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 77 90 96 116 163 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 107
Write 94.5
Mixed 68.6
SusWrite 116
71% 96.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 109%
WD WD20EZWX-60F5KA0 2TB
552GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 133 133 134 134 134 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
70% Very good
Read 107
Write 191
Mixed 105
SusWrite 135
99% 134 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1
349% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 70%
Great: 114%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 110 106 109 104 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 74
Write 99.3
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 105
64% 87 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.6
169% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP32D4U8S8HC-8X 029E CMW32GX4M2Z2933C16 HP32D4U8S8HC-8X 029E CMW32GX4M2Z2933C16 48GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
76.4% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 23.8
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 24.7
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx Builds (Compare 5,317 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 178%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 177%
UFO

System: HP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $1,130
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback