Today's hottest deals

Monster ABRA A7 V12.4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMonster ABRA A7 V12.4  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A7 V12.4
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201106
Uptime6.4 Days
Run DateJul 24 '22 at 09:07
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10200H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 93.7
1-Core 121
2-Core 242
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 407
8-Core 663
66% 535 Pts
64-Core 671
42% 671 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 8535) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.02% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 62.9
Parallax 3.9
2% 23.2 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 3.1
Splatting 6
4% 5.17 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.02%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GB
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7101Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 883 320 90 137 137 185 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 1,238
Write 954
Mixed 936
SusWrite 292
191% 855 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 68.9
236% 85.2 MB/s
DQ Read 481
DQ Write 802
DQ Mixed 578
456% 620 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 169%
Great: 169%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 36.1
MC Mixed 24.9
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 39.9
SC Mixed 27.1
81% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 60.6
66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A7 V12.4 Builds (Compare 280 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A7 V12.4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $47
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback