Today's hottest deals

Notebook PD5x_7xPNP_PNR_PNN_PNT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics12.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive183% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 89% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemNotebook PD5x_7xPNP_PNR_PNN_PNT  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook PD5x_7xPNP_PNR_PNN_PNT
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220602
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 25 '22 at 22:35
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU6%
CPU Throttled 89%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 72.9
1-Core 190
2-Core 389
112% 217 Pts
4-Core 729
8-Core 1,243
120% 986 Pts
64-Core 1,917
119% 1,917 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 105%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Clevo(1558 65F5) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1314
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Lighting 20.6
Reflection 202
Parallax 25.9
17% 83 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 8
Splatting 0.2
3% 4.7 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$167
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM15.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 711 703 686 715 682 685 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 602
Write 661
Mixed 621
SusWrite 697
146% 645 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 73.9
257% 98 MB/s
DQ Read 828
DQ Write 806
DQ Mixed 1,162
778% 932 MB/s
Poor: 183%
This bench: 183%
Great: 496%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X16GF3200C22S2 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 41.5
MC Write 40.7
MC Mixed 37.7
114% 40 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 42.5
SC Mixed 28.2
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 94.9
42% 94.9 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 108%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PD5x_7xPNP_PNR_PNN_PNT Builds (Compare 121 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Notebook PD5x_7xPNP_PNR_PNN_PNT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback