QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '22 at 08:09
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC-Rome
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Memory 89
1-Core 146
2-Core 293
96% 176 Pts
4-Core 553
8-Core 871
88% 712 Pts
64-Core 900
56% 900 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 96%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
107% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 114
Parallax 143
110% 130 fps
MRender 173
Gravity 128
Splatting 104
107% 135 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 107%
Great: 112%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 107GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,996
Write 2,299
Mixed 2,399
1,927% 2,565 MB/s
4K Read 60.8
4K Write 57.5
4K Mixed 58.4
10,087% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 150
1,322% 137 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
MC Read 45.8
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 36.4
99% 34.7 GB/s
SC Read 28.6
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 33
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback