Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FB_X509FB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive58% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 91% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FB_X509FB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X509FB
Memory17.4 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '22 at 12:16
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU10%
CPU Throttled 91%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8145U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
50.3% Above average
Memory 70.7
1-Core 94.1
2-Core 173
64% 113 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 182
24% 178 Pts
64-Core 227
14% 227 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia MX110
Asus(1043 119F) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6259
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.6% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 11
Parallax 7.6
6% 8.7 fps
MRender 11.7
Gravity 8.3
Splatting 8.2
8% 9.4 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.6%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 187 140 33 131 33 MB/s
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58% Above average
Read 201
Write 96.8
Mixed 206
SusWrite 118
35% 155 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 68.5
4K Mixed 28.2
108% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 121
118% 186 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 16ATF2G64HZ-3G2E1 20GB
2400, 3200 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.6% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 15.8
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 17.6
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 99.8
40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FB_X509FB Builds (Compare 172 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FB_X509FB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback