Today's hottest deals

Galax H81M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics8.37% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive58.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemGalax H81M  (all builds)
MotherboardGALAX H81M
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200827
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '22 at 16:30
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$115
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Memory 92.9
1-Core 109
2-Core 214
80% 138 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 584
62% 492 Pts
64-Core 584
36% 584 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Asus(1043 843E) 2GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
8.37% Terrible
Lighting 9.3
Reflection 12.1
Parallax 11.8
8% 11.1 fps
MRender 13.9
Gravity 12.1
Splatting 10.9
10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.37%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP S700 500GB-$60
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0329B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 217 216 222 209 215 MB/s
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58.8% Above average
Read 229
Write 215
Mixed 214
SusWrite 216
49% 219 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 72.8
4K Mixed 22.4
114% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 32.5
DQ Write 92.4
DQ Mixed 26.4
30% 50.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
34.8% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 9.8
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11.7
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Galax H81M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $190
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback