Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (95%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119 18,312 User benchmarks, average bench 50% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	49.3% Average	Memory 65.2 1-Core 58.4 2-Core 107 47% 76.7 Pts	4-Core 196 8-Core 184 26% 190 Pts	64-Core 194 12% 194 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660D 7,665 User benchmarks, average bench 5% AMD(1002 9901) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	3.03% Terrible	Lighting 3.2 Reflection 4.4 Parallax 6.6 3% 4.73 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 6.3 Splatting 5.3 4% 4.53 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.03% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Walram 120G 120GB 259 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: HC1A252P SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 224 232 125 174 56 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	43% Average	Read 299 Write 260 Mixed 218 SusWrite 169 53% 237 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 46.1 4K Mixed 9.7 64% 24.5 MB/s	DQ Read 27.9 DQ Write 77 DQ Mixed 12.4 21% 39.1 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Atermiter 1x8GB 346 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	19.9% Very poor	MC Read 8.5 MC Write 4.4 MC Mixed 6.6 19% 6.5 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 6.4 16% 5.47 GB/s	Latency 113 35% 113 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 38%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	16x
Radeon HD 7660DAMDBench 5%, 7,665 samples	9x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	1x

RAM
Atermiter 1x8GBUnknownBench 30%, 346 samples	8x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	6x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	5x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16