Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 4524RL2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemLenovo 4524RL2  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 18 '17 at 00:54
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$143
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 97.7
2-Core 190
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 465
50% 400 Pts
64-Core 473
29% 473 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$69
334GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 141
Write 139
Mixed 129
103% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 0.48
4K Mixed 0.25
70% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 84%
WDC WD20 EFRX-68EUZN0 2TB
2TB free, PID 9561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 134
Write 112
Mixed 98.6
142% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.87
4K Write 2.38
4K Mixed 0.25
93% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 56%
WDC WD20 EFRX-68EUZN0 2TB
2TB free, PID null
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 139
Write 151
Mixed 78.5
154% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 2.49
4K Mixed 0.28
98% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 61%
WDC WD20 EFRX-68EUZN0 2TB
2TB free, PID null
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 141
Write 140
Mixed 61.4
139% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 2.38
4K Mixed 0.28
94% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 61%
WDC WD20 EFRX-68EUZN0 2TB
2TB free, PID 9561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 120
Write 82.1
Mixed 46.2
95% 82.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 0.43
4K Mixed 0.22
25% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 56%
WDC WD20 EFRX-68EUZN0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID null
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 119
Write 125
Mixed 77.8
135% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 0.42
4K Mixed 0.23
25% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 61%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 32GB
14GB free, PID dd4a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 101
Write 89.1
Mixed 35
89% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.26
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 1.05
105% 2.88 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.7% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 4524RL2 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 4524RL2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 20% - Poor Total price: $519
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback